Category Archives: current affairs

Some entertaining reading on Mugabeland

The nutty dictatorOne of the Economist journalists is keeping a journal after sneaking back into Zim to check things out. He had previously been thrown out for being “a spy masquerading as a tourist” and was pretty frightened on his way in, especially after learning that “the man from Time spent an uncomfortable five days in the jug, without food”.

His first entry is about trying to sneak in without being noticed. He talks about having used “tennis rackets, bird-watching guides and enormous paintings” in the past to get in as a tourist. He was mightily relieved to find that although the government had boasted of a computerised list of banned journalists, they didn’t have any computers at the airport!

Hi second entry talks about how both Mugabe and the country he rules are strange combinations of wonderful and terrible. He describes how Mugabe is such a strange character:

  • “There’s something about the president, those Elton John glasses, the camp flicking of his wrists, the moustache that recalls both Chaplin and Hitler, that makes him as much a caricature as a real man”
  • “He is smart, agile, hard-working, yoga-exercising, frugal and he cracks a crude joke or two (Australians are “genetically modified criminals”; Tony Blair is a “boy in shorts” who leads a “government of gay gangsters”)”
  • “But he is a charmer with fingers dipped in blood.” Lately he has brutalised opposition supporters and “worst of all, in the early 1980s as he established his control, Mr Mugabe directed the murder of many thousand opponents in the country’s south.”

Africa is GDP anorexic

World map showing relative GDP’sI just came across a cool site called World Mapper which generates statistical maps of the world. They warp the sizes of countries to show relative statistics. For instance the image on the left (click for full size) shows world GDP (at purchasing parity). As you can see countries in the northern hemisphere are a lotter richer than us in the south. Most of Africa has all but disappeared in this view! Also have a look at the size of Japan!

 

Africa is a lot more prominent in the next map. Unfortunately that’s because it shows relative homicide rates (murder and manslaugther but excluding war). And look at South Africa – a fat blob even compared to the rest of Africa!

World map showing relative homicide rates

Network Neutrality

I suppose that if you aren’t a geek (like me) you may not have heard of the “Net Neutrality” debate. I think that it’s actually quite an interesting (and important) argument.

What is net neutrality? Net neutrality is the principle that network operators (like Telkom or AT&T) should give equal treatment to all the traffic on their networks.

Currently, the internet blindly delivers data packets regardless of what they contain. The network just gets data and passes it on – no matter what is in there. This is what makes the internet flexible – anyone can send anything they want.

In the US the telecoms firms (AT&T, Verizon, etc) want to be allowed to charge content providers (e.g. Google, BBC, any web site) a fee for providing their content on a faster connection. In effect, they plan “express toll lanes” alongside the internet’s existing highways.

They are promising to leave the normal traffic as it is – they just want to have special lanes for people who pay more. Sounds fair(ish).

There are a few reasons why I don’t like this idea:

  • Why would the operators upgrade the normal networks if they could be making more money by upgrading the expensive ones?
  • This would tilt the internet toward the big sites. Little sites like www.alistairpott.com are going to be much slower than the big boys.
  • Once a few sites pay up they will all be sucked in. If Google pays for faster delivery then Yahoo! will have to follow.

So I don’t like the idea of allowing operators to violate network neutrality. But, I hate over-regulation so I don’t think that over-strict rules should be put in place the preserve neutrality. As usual, I think the guys at The Economist have got the right idea:
“A minimal set of rules to protect net neutrality would still leave room for operators to experiment with new premium services.”

Google’s stance on net neutrality

Game theory model of the effects of removing network neutrality